There are two phases to your investment life span, accumulation and distribution. Accumulation is the portion of your working life where you save and presumably invest as much as possible to fund activities and a lifestyle later on in life, most commonly retirement. We discuss this phase of life most often in this blog when we examine investing and the method of planning for this part of life is called Goals-Based Planning. This column is meant to focus on the distribution phase of life or living off of your investments. We refer to this as Cash-Flow Planning.
First off, there are tax implications when considering distributions from investment accounts that differ from investor to investor. So here are some simple rules of thumb: take distributions from “taxable” accounts (bank accounts and brokerage accounts) first and from tax-deferred accounts (IRA’s, 401(k)’s, annuities) last. Let the power of tax-deferred compounding help you for as long as possible. Most investors will pay capital gains tax rates of about 20% rather than higher income tax rates (or no taxes when investing in tax free bonds) on distributions from the former. You will then pay income tax rates on gains from tax-deferred accounts as you draw down on them. Most importantly, you should get professional advice from a Certified Financial Planner and a Certified Public Accountant long before considering retirement so that you have a distribution strategy ready when that day comes.
Broadly speaking, there are a few ways to look at how to best draw down your money from various investment accounts. Again, we are simplifying that process here for illustrative purposes. Your situation is specific to you and may differ. We will make certain assumptions here are that are equally as important as the title subject but are complex enough that they deserve their own column. Risk for example is again, unique to the investor and will in large part, dictate your investment outcome so we will assume that readers are of “moderate risk” for these examples. Read More
We discuss investing and investor behavior here most often, but financial planning is equally important. Unfortunately, planning is a very personal undertaking so we are limited by how much information we can dispense in this format. This brief post will visit a topic that is increasingly front and center for women, retirement planning. We will give you the questions and issues you should address to help guide you in retirement. Of course, we advise you to work with a competent and credentialed planner.
Some sobering statistics:
Approximately three out of five working women earn less than $40,000 per year.
Just 45% of working women participate in retirement plans.
Across all employer retirement plans, men tend to have higher average account balances and the gap gets wider with age – women over 70 have less than half the balance of men the same age.
My partner, David Connelly and I are fans of business stories, how they were founded and whether or not they became successful. We are often asked how our company, Symmetry Partners, came to be. We met at a very large Wall Street brokerage firm in the early ‘90’s, Dean Witter. We learned certain things from each other and subsequently became friends. One of the things I taught David was the wisdom of index investing. Read More
A word about volatility. We’ve been writing about this topic periodically for nearly 25 years. Let’s put that in perspective: the DJIA was at 3,800 25 years ago; we endured the Asian market meltdown; the run up and blow up of tech stocks; the Great Recession; the Greek default; Brexit; the 2016 elections; etc. Today the DJIA stands at around 24,000. Yet investors get quite frightened from time to time due largely to market volatility. Short term volatility often stems from the headlines of the day but in the long run, indices like the S&P 500 and the DJIA are reflective of the fortunes of the companies that make up those indices. Read More
***Attention: Retired Investors***
***Subject: Retirement income considerations***
*We will not be discussing pension income in this blog piece – specific income and investment strategies should be discussed with your financial planner as they can be as unique as your individual circumstances. *
Last month we discussed biases or behavioral tendencies that keep investors from enjoying an excellent investment experience. A popular bias is recency effect. It’s a simple concept yet powerful and it can cost you plenty. Recency: “You recall recent events more clearly than events happening longer ago.” Well of course you do, but how is that dangerous? You expect the events (or in the case of financial markets, performance) of the recent past to continue into the future. The recent performance of the U.S. market, particularly the S&P 500 index which tracks the largest U.S. companies, has performed exceptionally well over the past few years. Unfortunately, future returns from markets are unknowable. From 2013 – 2017, the average annual return of the S&P was 15.8%, well above its long term historical average of 10.2% (since 1926)1. So investors start to consider if they should have all of their money invested in the S&P. So where is the danger? If this were 2010, we’d be writing that the S&P 500 just concluded a 10 year period that resulted in a -0.9% average annual loss – put another way, you lost 10% of your wealth over a 10 year period! Read More
Sounds exciting, doesn’t it? In fact, the more investors hear about this school of thought, the more they come to realize why they make the (sometimes frustrating) decisions they do where money is concerned. A brief history: most of the work in this field is credited to three academics, Amos Tversky (deceased), Daniel Kahneman, and Richard Thaler. The last two gentleman, who both worked with Tversky at times, were recognized for their work by the Nobel committee, Kahneman in ’02 and Thaler in ’17 (the prize is not awarded posthumously). Read More
We think the best chances of success for an individual investor are tied to their relationship with their advisor. Of course some may opt to do it themselves. In our experience, this takes tremendous discipline. Investors can save themselves money by taking this route, no doubt, but the majority of investors choose to work with someone. Do-it-yourselfers run some very simple but real risks, namely not identifying those biases we all share that can lead to costly mistakes. A good advisor educates investors about these biases to help them see decisions more clearly. A piece on said biases is forthcoming.
As with all professions, some advisors are better than others. How do you find the right one for you? Interestingly, many investors don’t offer up referrals of their advisor to their friends willingly. Of course there are exceptions, but many choose to keep this relationship to themselves so asking friends and family for a name is a start, but only a start. You must first decide what is important to you. Not all advisors work in the same way.
These five questions are a good place to start Read More
What’s in a name? In the case of big U.S. corporations, often times it’s a rich history, culture, values, brand loyalty, etc. So what have the executives at Wells Fargo been smoking these past few years? Fake account scandals, improper trading of retail investments, unneeded auto insurance, and apparently more to come. They’ve paid enormous fines so far in just a couple of years, including $1 billion this April.
The intent of this article isn’t to cast aspersions on Wells Fargo, they are just the whipping boy of the moment, and deservedly so. Financial scandals are as old as time. A few years ago, we wrote about J.P. Morgan, and Citigroup and Merrill Lynch before that. Wells is just the latest example of what’s wrong in financial services for Main Street investors, retail investors. Main Street has never been well served by the finance industry. That doesn’t mean that, 1) there aren’t hard working ethical people within these big firms and, 2) Wall Street hasn’t served retail investors well in certain respects. Read More
This post was written by guest columnist Harvey Siegel, CPA. Harvey is a senior financial advisor based out of Apella Capital’s Lenox, MA office.
On Monday, October 19, 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) closed down 508 points, or 22.6%. “Black Monday,” as it was called, remains the largest one-day percentage decline in the history of the DJIA. Your writer files it as a “where were you when it happened?” moment. Less than a month later, the founding principals of the predecessor to and currently senior financial advisors of Apella Capital, Lenox, MA started their new business.
In the last thirty years notwithstanding asset bubbles, three stock market crashes and as many recessions, political turmoil, wars, natural disasters, Eurozone crises, the rise of terrorism and the worst financial meltdown and economic downturn since you know when, the S&P 500 had a total return of over 2,000%. Read More
Financial Planning might be one of the more boring phrases people hear. For some, the thought of it is downright terrifying. And with good reason; thinking about retirement is scary and trying to organize your household budget is a daunting task for many. Some people are fortunate and born organized. But for the rest of us, we’d rather clean out the garage. As with many things now driven by software, financial planning has come a long way. In the ‘80’s and ‘90’s, planning was done with what we’d now call a spreadsheet. It was all manual and it was largely out of date within weeks of its completion. Most planners worked on commission and for many, the plan was the vehicle used to sell expensive (and often poorly performing) products. Well, planning has come a long way. Read More
Irrational is too strong a word but it’s one we read about in (behavioral) finance quite a bit. Investors that panic sell in bad times or that expect unsustainable high returns forever in good times are not irrational. In fact, we can see how they come to their decisions. There’s a difference between irrational and uninformed. Read More
Investors are all too often distracted by noise in markets. "Noise" is actually an statistical term to describe "unexplained variability in a data sample". Yet Wall Street gurus are ready and willing to offer explanations ad nauseam. Our wise colleague Harvey Seigel, offers his take... Read More
Are you associated with a not-for-profit organization? Maybe you volunteer some of your time for a cause about which you feel strongly. If you don’t do something along these lines currently, you may very well find yourself in this position in the future. Save this column for that time as it can help you understand the great responsibility that comes with stewardship. Read More
In 1997, my colleague Harvey Siegel in our Lenox, MA office, wrote about market volatility. He cited the fact that from 1990 through 1997 the US stock market (S&P 500 index) gained 300% and that investors should not expect a move like this to continue unabated. After all, market volatility is the price we pay to get the market return. Due to market gyrations last summer, Harvey and his partners, Ed Richter and Barry Wesson, revisited that column. Considering the past few week's market moves, I thought it deserved yet another look and it's re-posted here: Read More
Harvard has begun exiting a large investment made six years ago in natural resources. Much of these investments were made outside the U.S. as in Central American teak forests, Australian cotton farms, a eucalyptus plantation in Uruguay, and timberland in Romania. The endowment thought they could take advantage of growing demand in scarce resources around the globe, particularly in emerging markets according to former head of Harvard’s endowment, Jane Mendillo, in a 2012 Bloomberg interview. In the past year the endowment has written down the value of its global natural resources portfolio by $1.1 billion. Over the past 10 years the fund has returned 4.4% on average. Contrast those returns with a simple buy and hold 60% stock and 40% bond index portfolio (rebalanced annually) that returned about 6.5% over the same time period. Read More
A quick note for investors concerned about recent volatility in the stock market. That’s what a blog is good for (maybe), right? On January 26, the Dow Jones Industrial Average reached 26,616.71. The S&P 500 index reached 2,872.87 that same day. On February 5th, they closed at 24,345.75 and 2,648.94 respectively. On February 6th as I write this, the averages are back up. That’s around an 8% drop in short order. Read More
Turmoil. An investor asked me if I was concerned about the “turmoil in Washington” and its effect on markets. I asked him, “When hasn’t there been turmoil in Washington?” Or in the Middle East…North Korea…Russia…Venezuela…you get the picture. Read More
From time to time this blog will invite guest columnists to weigh in. Today Harvey Siegel, Senior Financial Advisor and colleaugue at Apella Capital in Lenox, MA shares his thoughts. Read More
As 2017 comes to an end, so now begins the painful process of self-examination amongst Wall Street’s finest prognosticators. I entered this industry as a management trainee with Paine Webber in 1983 (ugh). Since that time I have noticed that Wall Street engages in a tortuous ritual where market experts make predictions on how various markets will perform in the coming year. I don’t recall when the financial print media actually began tracking and holding them accountable but it took far too long. And it doesn’t appear to have spread to the financial news shows on TV – the same tired hacks keep shooting their mouths off while the networks pay scant attention to their track records. I mean, what’s the media for? Read More
I don’t know why I’m still a bit surprised every time I read about an advisor stealing from clients. I suppose it’s because I’m “in the business” and I can’t fathom anyone falling for the lines these advisors use. I forget that a smooth talking advisor can make just about any “investment opportunity” sound great and coupled with the abuse of trust they’ve established, the client is often beyond saving. Read More